What are Game Mechanics?

Despite “game mechanics” being one of the most mentioned phrases of game production and consuming alike, as I entered the Games Design course at LCC, it occurred to me that I – or any of my classmates – did not actually have a clear definition of what they are.

So I entered on a journey, attempting to find out what exactly game mechanics are, and if they are definable at all.

The first official distinction between rules and mechanics seems to occur in the book The Structural Elements of Games(1971) by Avedon. Since then, many researchers have attempted to pinpoint a single clear-cut definition.
Some say mechanics are a categorisation or bundle of rules (Lundgren, Björk). Others claim it is the specific actions the player can take in order to interact with the game environment (Fullerton, Hunicke, R. & LeBlanc, M & Zubec, R).

A slightly different approach is taken by game scholar Järvinen(2008), who states the easiest way to describe a mechanic, is by using verbs. If we use the arcade classic, Space Invaders, as an example then mechanics would boil down to things such as shoot, move, and evade.

Lastly, a very interesting definition comes from Miguel Sicart(2008) in his paper Defining Game Mechanics: “Game mechanics are methods invoked by agents, designed for interaction with the game state” (Sicart, 2008)
This definition is very different from any of the previous, because Sicart approaches the issue through programming, specifically Object Orientation. By saying invoked by agents, he is talking about any involvement with the system, no matter if this is done by a player or by the AI. This means, that all of a sudden non-player-characters or game objects alienated from the player is also subjected to mechanics. In the example of Space Invaders again, this means the actions of the invaders are also considered mechanics, even if they do not apply to the player.

Despite many researchers attempting to write one single definition of game mechanics, it does indeed seem like the subject is abstract and yet undefined. And even if it is possible to come to a conclusion, we are still only halfway. Next is the matter of distinguishing core mechanics, primary mechanics, secondary mechanics, and define exactly how all of these differ from each other.

The conclusion of this post, however, must be that a definition of mechanics (even if this is slightly subjective) is useful for communicating with other members of a development team, or in understanding the nature of games better.

References

Avedon, E.M. (1971) “The Structural Elements of Games” The Study of Games. New York: John Wiley & Sons

Lundgren, S & Björk, S. (2003) “Game Mechanics: Describing Computer-Augmented Games in Terms of Interaction” Proceedings of TIDSE Volume 3 (November). Available at: http:// citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.13.5147

Fullerton, Tracy (2004) Games Design Workshop. Third Edition, New York: CRC Press.

Hunicke, R. & LeBlanc, M & Zubec, R (2004) “MDA: A Formal Approach to Game Design and Game Research” Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Challenges in Game AI Volume 4, p. 1 (July) Available at: http://www.aaai.org/Papers/Workshops/2004/WS-04-04/WS04-04-001.pdf

Järvinen, A (2008) “Games without Frontiers: Theories and Methods for Game Studies and Design” University of Tampere (March). Available at: http://tampub.uta.fi/handle/10024/67820

Sicart, M (2008) “Defining Game Mechanics” Game Studies volume 8 issue 2 (December) Available at: http://gamestudies.org/0802/articles/sicart

Ludology

Nishikado, T (1978) Space Invaders Taito.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s